<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <rss version="2.0"> <channel> <title>Australia Jobs: Find Work &amp; Career Opportunities in Australia</title> <link>https://www.australiajobs.app</link> <description>Discover the latest job opportunities across Australia. Search thousands of full-time and part-time positions, career advice, and employment resources for working in Australia.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 04:12:29 GMT</lastBuildDate> <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs> <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator> <language>en</language>  <copyright>All rights reserved 2024, AustraliaJobs.app</copyright> <category>Bitcoin News</category> <item> <title><![CDATA[CSIRO to Cut 350 Jobs Despite $387M Funding Boost: A Contradiction in Science Policy?]]></title> <link>https://www.australiajobs.app/article/csiro-to-cut-350-jobs-despite-387m-funding-boost-a-contradiction-in-science-policy</link> <guid>csiro-to-cut-350-jobs-despite-387m-funding-boost-a-contradiction-in-science-policy</guid> <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 05:56:12 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Australia's national science agency, the **CSIRO**, has confirmed it will proceed with plans to cut up to **350 jobs**, despite receiving an additional **$387.4 million** in federal funding. The funding, announced today, is on top of $278 million allocated last year and the agency's existing annual budget of nearly $1 billion. CSIRO chief executive **Doug Hilton** expressed gratitude for the government's "vote of confidence" in science, but stated the job cuts are necessary for the agency's long-term sustainability. The cuts, part of a restructuring announced in November, are already underway and will affect over 300 full-time roles. This news comes after more than **800 positions** were eliminated at CSIRO over the past two years, including 850 in February 2024. The agency, renowned for inventing **Wi-Fi**, **plastic bank notes**, **Aerogard**, and the **Hendra virus vaccine**, is shifting its research portfolio to address strategic priorities. Federal Science Minister **Tim Ayres** defended the funding, calling it an investment in Australia's future health, welfare, and prosperity. He highlighted an additional **$38 million per year** for upgrading the **Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness** in Geelong, emphasizing the need to prepare for future pandemics. However, the **CSIRO Staff Association** (part of the CPSU) criticized the cuts, stating that **1,150 jobs** have been lost in two years. Union president **Beth Vincent-Pietsch** described the funding as "cold comfort" for affected workers and demanded an end to further job losses. ## Key Points - **CSIRO** will cut up to **350 jobs** despite a **$387.4 million** funding injection. - The agency has already cut over **800 positions** in the past two years. - The government says the funding ensures CSIRO's sustainability and supports pandemic preparedness. - Unions argue the funding should halt all job cuts and protect Australia's research capability.]]></description> <author>contact@australiajobs.app (AustraliaJobs.app)</author> <category>csiro</category> <category>jobcuts</category> <category>sciencefunding</category> <category>australianresearch</category> <category>publicsectorjobs</category> <enclosure url="https://live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au/92a81314352684a911c9331f09d4376a?impolicy=wcms_watermark_news&cropH=2813&cropW=5000&xPos=0&yPos=260&width=862&height=485&imformat=generic" length="0" type="image//92a81314352684a911c9331f09d4376a"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Why Middle Managers Are the Most Vulnerable to Tech Layoffs Right Now]]></title> <link>https://www.australiajobs.app/article/why-middle-managers-are-the-most-vulnerable-to-tech-layoffs-right-now</link> <guid>why-middle-managers-are-the-most-vulnerable-to-tech-layoffs-right-now</guid> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 22:56:25 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[AI is reshaping the tech industry, and one role is feeling the heat more than others: **middle managers** who don't engage in individual contributor work. According to a recent analysis, these managers are increasingly at risk of layoffs as companies leverage AI to streamline oversight and reduce overhead. ### The Shift in Management Roles Traditionally, middle managers acted as bridges between executives and frontline employees, handling tasks like performance reviews, project coordination, and communication. However, with the rise of AI tools that can automate reporting, track productivity, and facilitate decision-making, the need for these purely supervisory roles is diminishing. ### Why Middle Managers Are Targeted Companies are under pressure to cut costs and improve efficiency. **AI systems** can now perform many managerial functions, such as monitoring workflows and generating insights, without the need for human intervention. This makes middle managers who do not contribute directly to product development or technical tasks especially vulnerable. ### The Impact on the Tech Workforce Layoffs in tech have been widespread, but the trend is particularly pronounced for managers. Data shows that **layoff rates for middle managers** have increased significantly compared to individual contributors. This shift is forcing many to reconsider their career paths, either by moving into more hands-on roles or upskilling to stay relevant. ### What This Means for Your Career If you're in a management role, it's crucial to **develop technical skills** or take on individual contributor responsibilities. Emphasizing your ability to work with AI tools and contribute directly to projects can make you more indispensable. The future of tech management may lie in hybrid roles that combine leadership with hands-on expertise. ### Adapting to the New Landscape To thrive, middle managers should focus on: - **Upskilling** in areas like data analysis, coding, or AI implementation. - **Demonstrating value** through tangible contributions to products or services. - **Staying agile** and open to role changes as companies evolve. The message is clear: in the age of AI, pure management is no longer a safe bet. Adaptability and technical proficiency are key to job security.]]></description> <author>contact@australiajobs.app (AustraliaJobs.app)</author> <category>techlayoffs</category> <category>middlemanagers</category> <category>aiimpact</category> <category>careeradvice</category> <category>futureofwork</category> <enclosure url="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA22s90r.img?w=612&h=459&m=4&q=75" length="0" type="image/img"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Tasmania Slashes Public Sector Job Cuts by 800 Ahead of May Budget]]></title> <link>https://www.australiajobs.app/article/tasmania-slashes-public-sector-job-cuts-by-800-ahead-of-may-budget</link> <guid>tasmania-slashes-public-sector-job-cuts-by-800-ahead-of-may-budget</guid> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:56:14 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Tasmania’s planned cull of public sector jobs has been **wound back by 800 positions**, with the state government now aiming to shed **1,800 roles** instead of the 2,600 flagged late last year. Premier Jeremy Rockliff confirmed the revised target on Wednesday, saying the change reflected **updated population growth figures** rather than a softening of the broader workforce strategy. The state government has long argued the public service needs to be **“right-sized” by 6.6% by 2032** to match the state’s population. Rockliff said the goal remained **5,315 public servants for every 100,000 Tasmanians**. “That target is going to 2032 and so, in a very measured and purposeful way, we will achieve that target,” he said. Asked how the figure had dropped by 1,000 positions when population numbers had barely shifted, Rockliff said only that the data had changed and the new target reflected it. He confirmed the revision was made in recent weeks but had not been publicly announced before journalists raised it on Wednesday. The recalculation lands just a fortnight out from the **May 21 state budget**, which Treasurer Eric Abetz is using to try to claw back a string of large deficits and rein in mounting state debt. Rockliff said the budget would be a difficult one, pointing to global economic uncertainty and Tuesday’s Reserve Bank rate rise. “We need to live within our means, sustainable budgets moving forward and ensuring we’re investing in the right areas for the Tasmanian people,” he said. The government has **ruled out new taxes and asset sales**, leaving fewer options to repair the bottom line now that the workforce reduction has been scaled back. Rockliff pointed to the federal government’s plan to cut 28,000 public service jobs as evidence the approach was not unique to Tasmania. “The federal government recognised the need for right size, right structure,” he said.]]></description> <author>contact@australiajobs.app (AustraliaJobs.app)</author> <category>tasmania</category> <category>publicsector</category> <category>jobcuts</category> <category>budget</category> <category>workforcereduction</category> <enclosure url="https://cdn.pulsetasmania.com.au/images/pmg/38ec0cf4-ld8g829lyisedn2_f3vdd_70lcf.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Indian-Origin Student's Viral Rejection for Cashier Job Sparks Debate on Graduate Underemployment]]></title> <link>https://www.australiajobs.app/article/indian-origin-students-viral-rejection-for-cashier-job-sparks-debate-on-graduate-underemployment</link> <guid>indian-origin-students-viral-rejection-for-cashier-job-sparks-debate-on-graduate-underemployment</guid> <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 05:56:18 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[An Indian-origin university graduate’s failed attempt to land a supermarket job has sparked fresh questions about whether the job market is failing young people. 21-year-old **Raksha Hegde** in Australia went viral after revealing she was rejected for a part-time retail assistant role while trying to support herself during her master’s studies. Her experience triggered a debate about **graduate underemployment** and the **value of higher education** in today’s job market. In an Instagram video, Hegde expressed disbelief at being rejected, especially given her academic background. 'Bro, I just got rejected as a retail assistant. Basically a cashier!' she said. 'I’ve done a three-year degree, and doing my master’s and I can’t get a f***ing job. Are you telling me I went to uni for three years just to get rejected as a cashier?' She added: 'Let me get my master’s degree for two years and spend more money to get a degree so that I can’t find a single job after putting so much time, money and investment into school, uni and yet… they don't want to hire me.' Some social media users noted that being **highly educated** can sometimes work against candidates in such jobs. Retail employers may worry that **overqualified applicants** will leave quickly for better opportunities, making them less attractive hires. Others pointed out that supermarket roles often focus less on formal education and more on **practical factors** such as availability, flexibility, and attitude. Employers may prioritize candidates who can commit long term over those still studying or aiming for corporate careers.]]></description> <author>contact@australiajobs.app (AustraliaJobs.app)</author> <category>graduateunderemployment</category> <category>jobmarket</category> <category>australia</category> <category>retailjobs</category> <category>overqualification</category> <enclosure url="https://static.toiimg.com/thumb/msid-130716801,width-1280,height-720,imgsize-49230,resizemode-6,overlay-toi_sw,pt-32,y_pad-600/photo.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Why the RBA's Job-Saving Rate Stance Is a Policy Mistake]]></title> <link>https://www.australiajobs.app/article/why-the-rbas-job-saving-rate-stance-is-a-policy-mistake</link> <guid>why-the-rbas-job-saving-rate-stance-is-a-policy-mistake</guid> <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 22:56:14 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[In a provocative opinion piece, economist Warren Hogan argues that the Reserve Bank of Australia's (RBA) decision to keep interest rates steady to protect jobs is fundamentally flawed. He contends that **unemployment is no longer a macroeconomic issue** but a microeconomic one, requiring targeted labour market policies rather than aggregate demand management. Hogan criticizes Australia's economic policymakers for failing to recognize a **fundamental shift in supply and demand** due to demographic changes. Until they understand that unemployed labour resources are not the result of deficient aggregate demand, they will remain "hostage to ideologues" and make persistent policy errors. The article suggests that the RBA's approach is outdated, as it clings to traditional views that high interest rates kill jobs. Instead, Hogan calls for a **rethink of monetary policy** to address the real causes of unemployment, which he believes are structural and microeconomic in nature. **Key Points:** - Unemployment is now a **microeconomic problem**, not macroeconomic. - Demographic changes have altered the **balance of supply and demand** in the economy. - Policymakers must shift from aggregate demand management to **labour market-specific policies**. - The RBA's steady rate policy may be **counterproductive** in the long run. - Without this shift, Australia risks **persistent policy errors** and economic stagnation.]]></description> <author>contact@australiajobs.app (AustraliaJobs.app)</author> <category>rba</category> <category>monetarypolicy</category> <category>unemployment</category> <category>australianeconomy</category> <category>demographicchange</category> <enclosure url="https://static.ffx.io/images/$zoom_0.2222%2C$multiply_3%2C$ratio_1.777778%2C$width_1059%2C$x_142%2C$y_0/t_crop_custom/c_scale%2Cw_800%2Cq_88%2Cf_jpg/t_afr_opinion_no_age_social_wm/954067019fd4b5a98124dea10de30f2a6da8e8c6" length="0" type="image/777778%2C$width_1059%2C$x_142%2C$y_0/t_crop_custom/c_scale%2Cw_800%2Cq_88%2Cf_jpg/t_afr_opinion_no_age_social_wm/954067019fd4b5a98124dea10de30f2a6da8e8c6"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Australia's Strong Jobs Market at Risk: Government Tightens Budget Amid Global Shocks]]></title> <link>https://www.australiajobs.app/article/australias-strong-jobs-market-at-risk-government-tightens-budget-amid-global-shocks</link> <guid>australias-strong-jobs-market-at-risk-government-tightens-budget-amid-global-shocks</guid> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 22:56:13 GMT</pubDate> <description>< Inflation has surged from **3.7 per cent to 4.6 per cent** in March, its highest level since 2023. Rising fuel costs, driven by the Middle East conflict, pushed the Consumer Price Index up 0.9 per cent. Energy Minister Chris Bowen said Australia was "very well-placed to weather this storm" but warned that even if the war ended today, economic disruption would continue due to supply chain impacts from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.]]></description> <author>contact@australiajobs.app (AustraliaJobs.app)</author> <category>australiaeconomy</category> <category>federalbudget</category> <category>unemployment</category> <category>inflation</category> <category>globalshocks</category> <enclosure url="https://assets.sbs.com.au/dims4/default/d3168f1/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7267x4088+0+0/resize/1280x720!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsbs-au-brightspot.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com%2F01%2Fc5%2Fd2196e4d4ae5897b3f2fd8648602%2F20241217179162136787-original.jpg" length="0" type="image//dims4/default/d3168f1/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7267x4088+0+0/resize/1280x720!/quality/90/"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Early Burnout and Cancer Risk: Why Queensland Firefighters Are Quitting in Droves]]></title> <link>https://www.australiajobs.app/article/early-burnout-and-cancer-risk-why-queensland-firefighters-are-quitting-in-droves</link> <guid>early-burnout-and-cancer-risk-why-queensland-firefighters-are-quitting-in-droves</guid> <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 05:56:19 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Early-career Queensland firefighters are leaving the profession in alarming numbers, with new data revealing a troubling exodus. The primary drivers include **new research linking firefighting to cancer** and the lure of more appealing career alternatives. **Key findings:** - High turnover rates among early-career firefighters. - Growing concerns over occupational cancer risks. - Firefighters seeking better work-life balance and safer job options. This trend highlights the need for improved occupational health measures and support systems to retain experienced personnel.]]></description> <author>contact@australiajobs.app (AustraliaJobs.app)</author> <category>firefighters</category> <category>cancer</category> <category>burnout</category> <category>queensland</category> <category>occupationalhealth</category> <enclosure url="https://content.api.news/v3/images/bin/2d33a9234e3a340ec3e9142398da1b1a" length="0" type="image//v3/images/bin/2d33a9234e3a340ec3e9142398da1b1a"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[AI Interviews Are Frustrating Job Seekers: Here's What You Need to Know]]></title> <link>https://www.australiajobs.app/article/ai-interviews-are-frustrating-job-seekers-heres-what-you-need-to-know</link> <guid>ai-interviews-are-frustrating-job-seekers-heres-what-you-need-to-know</guid> <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 05:56:11 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Nearly half (47%) of UK job seekers have had an AI interview, research from the hiring platform Greenhouse has found. In its survey of 2,950 active job seekers, including 1,132 UK-based workers, with additional respondents from the US, Germany, Australia and Ireland, it found that 30% of UK candidates had **walked away from a hiring process** because it included an AI interview. We asked people about their experiences of AI interviews. The responses included those who found it “awkward” and “humiliating”. Others spoke of wanting a **human element** in the interviews, and said they were not sure if their interview had even been reviewed. ### ‘It’s like you’re looking into a mirror and speaking to yourself’ Thomas*, 21, who is at university in the north of England, says he found the AI interview component of his job applications “frustrating”. He has applied for 15 jobs, and around 10 of them have involved AI interviews. In addition to these, they often have personality assessments and numerical and skills tests, all of which are completed online. Once he passed those, he was invited for an AI interview. “Most companies do faceless interviews, where you are given a prerecorded video of someone asking a question, followed by up to two minutes to plan a response, followed by three minutes to give your answer,” he says. “These are the worst of the three tests, as it feels strange talking into a camera, and it can be difficult to speak naturally. You can’t see anyone other than yourself. “It doesn’t feel real, it’s like you’re looking into a mirror and speaking to yourself. There’s no human interaction. If you had an in-person interview, you’d be able to see how someone’s reacting and that they’re acknowledging what you say.” Most of these interviews lasted about 10 minutes, but the longest one Thomas had was half an hour. He says that once he got through to the later rounds in the job application process, he would then have a face-to-face interview, which he described as “really good”. Thomas has secured a job and will start in September. In the meantime, he wishes companies could improve the AI interview experience. ### ‘I found the whole process humiliating’ Susannah*, 44, a scientist living in Cambridge, says she found her AI interview “awkward and humiliating”. After completing an online form last year for a “senior” scientific role, she sent off her CV and covering letter as requested and was then invited for an AI interview. Before the interview, she was asked for permission to let them use an AI interviewing system. Susannah says there “wasn’t any option not to accept, if I wanted to proceed with the application”. “The interview comprised five questions, and the whole thing lasted only 10 minutes or so,” she says. “I found it awkward and the whole process humiliating.” The interview took the form of a series of questions displayed on her computer screen, each of which she had to answer within three minutes. She would hit the record button when she began to speak, and a countdown clock would start on the screen. She says the “questions were very general, focused on behaviour at the workplace and could be applied to many other roles”. About a week later, she “received very general feedback and a rejection”. “I’m not even sure anybody watched the interview,” she adds. Susannah says she understands why companies use AI interviews. “There are just so many applications for these jobs that an HR department would not be able to go through them all.” Susannah, who is now contracting, says people do the AI interviews “because we are so desperate” for work. ### ‘I spoke in bullet points and keywords; the real me would never speak like that’ David*, 47, a marketing consultant living in Spain, says his AI interview was “completely horrible for the autistic brain”. “What followed was awkward to say the least,” he says of the 20-minute process. “I struggled immediately. I spoke in bullet points and keywords. The real me, who would take his time to understand the actual challenge and constraints of a project, would never deliver like that. In my line of work, there are always questions to ask before any solution can have merit. It’s a two-way thing and always will be.” Despite feeling he had not done well, he was invited to an interview with the chief executive of the company, who told David that he had put the AI interview transcripts through ChatGPT to see what it made of the candidates. Although David understands AI’s usefulness in some circumstances, he was not impressed with his first AI interview. “AI interviews are one-way. They minimise the investment for the hiring party and maximise the strain on the potential supplier. They’re also completely horrible for the autistic brain, and I presume not much nicer for others. “For me, it’s the worst thing possible, a countdown, answering a blank screen, no context. I can’t ask the question. But also, I don’t know if that’s autism or everyone, but I can’t pause, so you’re going to get some generic garbage out of me if you put me on the spot in a panic like that. I guess my garbage was strong enough, but it wasn’t true.” ### ‘When I paused, the AI agent decided I’d finished, so repeatedly interrupted and moved on’ Tom, a project manager living in Scotland, applied for a “side hustle” job – and said this probably made him view the AI interview with intrigue rather than ire. “If this had been a day job I was going for, I think I would have been far more grumpy about it,” says Tom, who is in his late 40s. After he submitted his CV, he was invited for an interview with an AI agent, which conducted a “reasonable” conversation with Tom via his computer screen. He likened it to a phone conversation, albeit one with the odd glitch. “When I would pause, ready to continue my answer, the AI agent had decided I’d finished, so repeatedly interrupted and moved on to the next question despite the answer not being complete,” he says. “The agent also picked up and reinforced the most minor points. I found it mildly amusing and intriguing, but then I am not depending on getting this job, so I could be a bit more relaxed about it.” He said an AI interview “can’t yet pick up on the subtleties of body language”. “Also, an interview should be a two-way thing: the potential employer interviewing you, but also I am interviewing them to see if I want the job.” The job was an AI-related project, so he says he can understand why the interview took the format it did. “I don’t think the technology is ready for a full-blown interview yet – I guess maybe it depends on what sort of job you’ll end up doing. But I think the human touch is probably a good thing, and I hope that lasts as long as possible.” *Name has been changed]]></description> <author>contact@australiajobs.app (AustraliaJobs.app)</author> <category>aiinterviews</category> <category>jobsearch</category> <category>recruitmenttrends</category> <category>candidateexperience</category> <category>ukjobmarket</category> <enclosure url="https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/95374b7f7a0d89df4409d018af7eb7b1a2bf645a/327_0_5668_4536/master/5668.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&precrop=40:21,offset-x50,offset-y0&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&enable=upscale&s=16ef07e6f75508e7f7826dcef001490d" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> </channel> </rss>