CSIRO's Controversial Workshops: A 'Survivor'-Style Battle for Research Survival

The front-facing Entomology building of the CSIRO headquarters in Canberra on a sunny day. Photo: CSIRO.

Australia's leading science and research agency, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), is currently holding a four-day workshop to determine the future direction of its portfolios and staffing levels. This process has sparked significant controversy, with the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) comparing it to the reality TV show Survivor, where research leaders must pitch their projects for survival.

The 'Survivor' Analogy and Union Criticism

Susan Tonks, the CPSU secretary for CSIRO matters, has been vocal in her criticism. She stated, "Over the last year and a half, we've seen science support roles cut to the bone. Now, the axe is swinging at the core of CSIRO – scientists, researchers, and their projects." She emphasized that this is not entertainment but a serious threat to Australian science and innovation, arguing that forcing different parts of the institution to battle for resources harms the nation's future capacity.

The union claims that the workshop is essentially a 'Tribal Council' to decide which research and jobs will be eliminated, posing a direct threat to Australia's ability to address national challenges and maintain global leadership in science.

CSIRO's Response and Rationale

A CSIRO spokesperson has rejected the Survivor comparison, stating that the workshop is not about competition but about reshaping the research portfolio to focus on delivering the science Australia needs. The spokesperson confirmed that some research will be "exited" as part of this process, citing increased operational costs and insufficient funding as key drivers.

"We must adapt to this challenge, ensuring we use the funding entrusted to us by the community in the best way," the spokesperson said. The agency aims to become simpler and more sustainable, doing fewer things better and at scale, with any changes following established processes and consultation with staff.

Impact and Broader Context

In the last financial year, CSIRO lost 440 jobs, and further cuts are expected. Staff involved report that research portfolio leaders are required to present cases arguing why their science should continue, highlighting the high stakes involved. This restructuring reflects broader trends in public funding and the need for scientific institutions to evolve in response to financial pressures.