Is the Secure Local Jobs Code Really Securing Jobs for Locals? A Critical Inquiry
Region.com.au1 week ago
980

Is the Secure Local Jobs Code Really Securing Jobs for Locals? A Critical Inquiry

INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
securelocaljobscode
actgovernment
localjobs
procurement
independentreview
Share this content:

Summary:

  • A committee inquiry recommends an independent review of the Secure Local Jobs Code due to conflicting evidence on its effectiveness.

  • Master Builders ACT argues the code is misleading, as it has no requirement to preference local employers or employees.

  • An interstate contractor banned in NSW still won ACT work under the code, raising concerns about integrity and enforcement.

  • The code was last reviewed in 2021, with no formal reviews planned, despite concerns it may not be achieving its goals.

  • Stakeholders call for data-driven assessment to replace anecdotal evidence and ensure the code delivers local jobs.

A committee inquiry has recommended an independent review of the Secure Local Jobs Code (SLJC) after conflicting evidence emerged about its effectiveness in creating jobs for Canberrans. The code, which commenced in January 2019, aims to ensure a level playing field for businesses tendering for ACT Government work and to meet minimum industrial relations and work health and safety standards.

However, Master Builders ACT argues the code is misleading, as there is no requirement to preference local employers or employees. CEO Anna Neelagama stated, "You can be code compliant and not employ a single local." She highlighted a case where an interstate contractor banned from work in New South Wales still obtained a certificate under the SLJC and won work in the ACT, despite suspected underpayments and unpaid tax.

The inquiry report expressed concern that the SLJC may not be achieving its aims of helping to "grow the local economy and create jobs for people in the ACT." The code was last reviewed in January 2021, with no formal reviews planned under legislation.

Finance Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith defended the code, saying it creates a level playing field and protects workers' rights. However, government officials acknowledged that some small- to medium-sized businesses lack the administrative capacity to meet the scheme's documentation requirements.

Ms Neelagama emphasized the need for data-driven assessment: "Supporting local building and construction businesses means that more of the ACT Government’s investment stays in the ACT economy." She argued that recent events confirm the committee's recommendation for a review.

The committee has called for an independent review to assess whether the SLJC is effectively achieving its stated outcomes, moving beyond anecdotal evidence to understand the full picture.

Comments

0

Join Our Community

Sign up to share your thoughts, engage with others, and become part of our growing community.

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts and start the conversation!

Newsletter

Subscribe our newsletter to receive our daily digested news

Join our newsletter and get the latest updates delivered straight to your inbox.

OR
AustraliaJobs.app logo

AustraliaJobs.app

Get AustraliaJobs.app on your phone!