Workers' Rights Upheld: FWC Rules on Post-Termination Dispute Resolution
Hrd America2 days ago
890

Workers' Rights Upheld: FWC Rules on Post-Termination Dispute Resolution

WORKPLACE RIGHTS
workplacerights
fairwork
redundancy
union
employmentdispute
Share this content:

Summary:

  • Workers can pursue disputes after job termination if initiated while employed

  • FWC rules jurisdiction continues until dispute resolution, regardless of employment status

  • Unions and workers treated as same party in dispute resolution

  • Practical interpretation of dispute procedures prioritized over technical compliance

  • Case proceeds to arbitration to determine redundancy payment entitlement

Employment Dispute Continues After Job Loss

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) recently addressed a critical question: Can workers pursue workplace disputes after their employment has ended? This case involved two female workers who disagreed with their employer over their employment classification and entitlement to redundancy payments.

The Core of the Dispute

The workers believed they were continuing employees entitled to redundancy payments, while the employer argued they were fixed-term employees whose contracts had simply expired. The union initiated dispute proceedings in December 2024, but the workers' employment ended before resolution. They then filed their own applications with the FWC in March 2025.

Jurisdictional Challenge

The employer contended that only the union could pursue the matter, as it had initiated the dispute. However, the FWC ruled that once jurisdiction is established, it continues until the dispute is resolved, regardless of employment status changes.

Key Takeaways

  • Workers can pursue disputes post-termination if the dispute was initiated while they were still employed.
  • Unions and workers are treated as the same party for dispute resolution purposes.
  • Dispute procedures should be interpreted practically, not technically, to avoid creating additional barriers.

What’s Next?

The matter will proceed to substantive arbitration to determine if the workers are entitled to redundancy payments. This ruling sets a precedent for similar cases, ensuring workers are not disadvantaged by procedural delays or employment termination.

Employment dispute continues despite workers losing their jobs

Comments

0

Join Our Community

Sign up to share your thoughts, engage with others, and become part of our growing community.

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts and start the conversation!

Newsletter

Subscribe our newsletter to receive our daily digested news

Join our newsletter and get the latest updates delivered straight to your inbox.

OR
AustraliaJobs.app logo

AustraliaJobs.app

Get AustraliaJobs.app on your phone!